evaluagentCX vs Klaus - evaluagent

evaluagentCX vs Klaus (Zendesk QA)

Wondering how evaluagentCX stacks up against Klaus?

Klaus (now Zendesk QA) caters to SMBs with a user-friendly interface and basic workflows – but it lacks integration flexibility, robustness for larger operations and customization when it comes to autoQA.

On the other hand, evaluagentCX boasts unmatched features:

Read more below to discover how evaluagentCX directly compares to Klaus.

Industry*: Airlines/Aviation, Apparel & Fashion, Automotive, Broadcast Media, Business Process Outsourcing / Offshoring, Business Services, Capital Markets, Civic & Social Organization, Communications, Computer Hardware, Computer Software, Construction and Building Materials, Consumer Electronics, Consumer Goods, Consumer Services, Cosmetics, E-Learning, Government, Education and Public Sector, Energy, Entertainment and Gaming, Financial Services & Insurance, Gambling & Casinos, Health, Wellness and Fitness, Information Technology and Services, Leisure, Travel & Tourism, Legal Services, Luxury Goods & Jewelry, Marketing and Advertising, Medical Practice and Devices, Mining & Metals, Non-Profit Organization Management, Pharmaceuticals, Retail, Staffing and Recruiting, Supermarkets, Telecommunications, Venture Capital & Private Equity, Other, Environmental services.

Number of agents*: Less than 50, 50-100, 101-250, 251-500, 501-1000, 1000+

Key differences: evaluagentCX vs Klaus (Zendesk QA)

evaluagentCX

Klaus

Get an impartial perspective

Here’s some honest feedback from customers and prospects who have tried both platforms, or switched from Klaus:

“evaluagentCX stood out with flexibility & customizability. They provide a comprehensive platform with features such as agent feedback which was not offered by Klaus.”
Quality Assurance Specialist at Online Trading Company

“I had plans to implement a QA tool in a large company with 450 agents, so it wasn’t just for small or medium-sized companies. Klaus didn’t seem to be the right fit for a contact center that size.”
Project Manager at Gaming & Entertainment Organisation

“Klaus’ sentiment analysis is limited. It only picks certain words and shows an emoji for that response, without reflecting the overall sentiment of the conversation. Insights aren’t labeled, and it can mark positive conversations as negative because it doesn’t consider the duration or flow of the conversation.”
Director of Contact Center Operations at Gaming Organisation

“We’re lacking reports in the Klaus reporting section. We need more data and more reports. Also, the auto QA isn’t working as well as we’d like. So, I’m doing a lot of manual work because Klaus’ reporting isn’t very helpful.”
Quality Manager at Financial Services Company

“With Klaus, I experienced difficulties filtering calls effectively, couldn’t use multiple scorecards for one call, lacked filtering options. I found their view options less customizable, noticed issues with the acknowledgment feature, and found the reporting suite less advanced, particularly in terms of category line item and root cause analysis.”
Contact Center Manager at Online Retailer

See how we compare

Market-leading transcription powered by Deepgram

Automated Agent Improvement

Deeper insights

Customizable to fit your operation

Personalized support and onboarding

Improving agent engagement

Robust operational reporting and improvement workflows

A platform that grows with you

Experience evaluagentCX

You’re just a click away from starting your journey towards intelligent automation of insight, QA and improvement. With evaluagentCX as your AI-powered co-pilot, you can create unrivaled customer experiences.